Summary: Peacocks
were tested to see if their feathers present a disadvantage in respect to their
ability to fly even though it is an obvious sexual advantage in attracting
peafowls. Tests were conducted on this question and results show that in fact,
their heavy plumages do not present much of a disadvantage to peacock flight.
Peacocks are one of the most famous examples used to
describe the definition of sexual selection. Their grand and colorful tail
feathers attract peafowls who use these tails as an indicator for a mate with good health.
However, these colorful feathers that drag behind the peacock are heavy and for
a long time, researchers have hypothesized that these birds have a physical
disadvantage when flying as their plumages take up the energy that could
potentially be used to fly longer or escape from predators faster.
However, recent research on this topic by Graham N. Askew
with assistance from professors at Loughborough University, tested to see if
this hypothesis was valid. Two groups of peacocks from the UK population of captive bred-birds were observed using high speed video cameras. One group was
in its natural state with their full plumages while the other group was made of
peacocks whose plumages were removed. Data on the energy expenditure and
aerodynamics of these two groups revealed that there wasn’t much of a
difference in their ability to fly. The total energy that is required for
take-off was slightly higher in those with the plumage but not significant
enough to support the old hypothesis. The power required to generate the same
velocity was not significantly different between the two groups either.
To ensure that flight muscles weren’t exerting more energy (in
the group with the plumage) to allow the bird to fly just as fast as it would
without the train of feathers, researchers also checked the mechanical power
output of the flight muscles but there was no evidence for this hypothesis. Based
on the data and the observations of how these two groups take-off for flight,
it is understood that the drag force on the plumage is dependent on the flight
velocity and the angle at which the plumage is when the bird takes off. The
drag force (the force of the plumage feathers weighing down the bird) was calculated to be only 0.12-0.15 Newtons. This force increases
the parasite power (the power required to overcome the force of drag) which is
only 0.1% of the total power required for flight. This shows how insignificant the slight increase in the power needed to take off, is, in birds with the plumage.
Despite these studies, it cannot be confirmed that the
sexual advantage that peacocks have with their plumages is not a disadvantage.
In respect to flight and escaping predators, there is now evidence to support
the claim that heavy plumages are not a drag, however, in other respects these
ornaments may be a disadvantage to these birds.
Citation:
Askew, Graham N. 2014. The elaborate plumage in peacocks is
not such a drag. The Journal of Experimental Biology 217: 3237-3241
Hi Niharika,
ReplyDeleteI like the article that you posted and how it relates to an idea that most students learn about when they study the selection pressures of natural and sexual selection. From last semester's Concepts in Biology, I remember Dr. Fortune explaining how natural selection and sexual selection were sometimes at odds with each other because factors that sexual selection promotes may be discouraged by natural selection because they hinder the organism's survival. As to the research itself, I think that it was effective for scientists to also look at the mechanical output of the flight muscles. Analyzing work loops of muscular output and electrical stimulation patterns of muscles is a great way of comparing muscle activity under different constraints (tail or no tail). In terms of follow up studies, the next step may be to analyze other relationships such as tail size and predator attention: do predators pay particular attention to one tail size more than they do to another size.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHello Niharika,
ReplyDeleteThe research approached by the scientists in this study only explains that the plumage is not a burden to the birds. But a new twist to the study of plumage and peacocks may include researching the advantages (besides the purpose of attracting peafowls) of heavier plumage. Does a heavier plumage present any advantages (possibly during flight)?